Costuming My Bliss

Victorian underpinnings

1882 Corset
  • 1883 Split Drawers

    1883 split drawersAhem.  Fist let me apologize for my crappy drawing.  An artist, I am not. 

    As I have been decidedly unproductive of late, not to mention being sick to death of looking at my still unfinished corset, I thought a quick and easy project was in order.   So began the split drawers.  This pattern was drafted up from Fashions of the Guilded Age.  The pattern was originally printed in 1883.

    I started by embroidering the knee bands with a shamrock motif.  

    knee band embrioderyNext, I added the lace and narrow pink ribbon trim.

    finished knee band
    I hand finished all the seams, flat felling where appropriate, and turning under and hand stitching the allowance when not.

    Next up was the waistband.  True to form, it gave me all sorts of grief.  I just couldn't get the giant waist of the drawers to  pleat into the waistband evenly.  After a sleepless night of mulling the problem over, I gave up and just gathered the suckers.  

    Here's the finished project.  Sorry about the bad photos, they were taken in the bathroom mirror, in artificial light, sans flash.

    1883 split drawers front
                                               Front
    1883 split drawers back                                              Back

     I had someone ask me if these were indeed split.  The answer is yes.  I know it sounds risque to our modern sensibilities, but there was a very important reason they were left open.  Imagine being a Victorian lady, wearing drawers and a corset.  Where would the waistband to said drawers be?  Tucked under the corset. Trying to get it back there after using the loo, would be pretty difficult without getting completely undressed!  So, they came up with this ingenious solution!  

    Discretion being the better part of valor, these photos were taken over a pair of long johns.  

  • 1883 Chemise with narrow shoulders

    1883 chemise1/13/2010

    I spent yesterday drafting up the pattern from Fashions of the Gilded Age.  Went smoothly and I was able to get a mock up cut out and sewn together.  I thought it would be to small, but turns out, it was huge!  I pinned about 3" out of each side and was able to pinch another 2-3 out of the back. I also shortened the straps by 1/2 and inch.

    My camera battery is pleading exhaustion, but as soon as it's ready to go, I'll post pics of it's current state.  Won't have a chance to work on it tonight, so hopefully I'll get back to it tomorow eavening.

  • 1/15/2010

    The camera has revived it's self, so I now have pictures of the super-sized chemise.

    1883 chemise.  front view.  super-sizedHere's the front view.  See how the neckline dips a bit below the bust line?  Not good.  Also, the armscye is too high, and it is just waaaay to big.  

    I was concerned I had done something wrong in the drafting, so I went back and double checked my measurements.  They were just what they were supposed to be.  So the next step was to measure the apportioning scale. (apportioning scales are units of measure used by different drafting systems in place of regular units.  For this particular system, you use the one that corresponds to your half bust measurement.)  Each unit was equal to 1/3 of an inch, so when I measured the pattern, both front and back were 19".  that's 3" larger than my 1/2 bust.  Multiply that by 4, and you get 68"!  What?  You could seriously fit 2 of me in the thing!

    Now I was worried that there was a fundamental flaw in the whole system.  I started converting apportioning units for other garments and found that they were what they should be.  So the flaw is definitely in this pattern.  

    I sat down withe the pattern today, and removed 3' from each seam line.  I also lowered the armscye, although that may go down a little more when I get to the finishing stage.

    1883 chmise.  front view. altered.


    A much better fit, and you can no longer fit me and my twin inside!

    Next up, I'll bind the neckline, then get started on the "real" one made of tissue linen.  After that, I guess I'll no longer have an excuse to put off the corset.

     

     

  • 3/29/2010

    I've completely finished the cotton mock up of this one.  I decided not to bind the neckline as originally planned.   Instead, I used the scalloped stitch on my sewing machine, and went round all raw edges.  I also hand felled all the seams.

    cotton chemisecotton chemise
    You can see the scallop stitching a bit better in this shot.

    I'll be making this again in a tissue linen with pink scallop. 

 

 The proper undergarments are essential to obtaining the look and feel of any era.  This is very true of Victorian fashions. 

What comes to mind for most people when Victorian is mentioned, is the tiny waist, or wasp waist, that a corset can give.  While it's true that most ladies did wear corsets, there were some, known as "aesthetes" who shunned them as being unhealthy. M. Burgess had this to say to editor of the Homeopathic World in 1889: "....I must say, one would expect a doctor to know better than hint at corsets being anything but injurious....I cetainly think corsets are better done without......I have two daughters, and, as long as I am spared, they shall never wear any kind of corset...."  The full letter can be viewed here,at google books.

Corsets were not the only important foundation garment worn during the Victorian times.  The 1850's saw the rise of the crinoline.  (think "the King and I" and "Gone With the Wind")  By the mid 1860's the round shape had become elliptical, with the majority of the fullness in the back. 

The 1870's saw the rise of the bustle.  Some of them reached truly epic proportions!

With the late 1870's to early '80's we see the opposite happening.  The fullness of the bustle gets pushed down, toward the the knees, and the bodice gains in length, coming down over the hips.  This is the "Natural Form" or "Gilded Age", in my opinion, one of the most elegant fashion trends of the Victorian times.

The early to mid 1880's see the return to the bustle , though this time the bustle itself is just a small cage that sticks out from the backside.  

By the 1890's, or "the Gay '90" the bustle is gone for good.   This era is characterized by huge sleeves, high necklines, and all kinds of romantic details on top.  The skirts were gored, sometimes called umbrella skirts.  This is the real beginning of the "suite" for women.  Shirtwaist, jacket, skirt.

The point of this mini fashion overview is that all these fashions required different support garments.  And those garments changed with the outer fashions.  

Corsets went from ending at the waist, to coming down over the hips.  Skirt supports went from bell shaped cages, to small roundish ones just in the back, to merely a stiff petticoat and some horse hair braid in the hems.

With that being said, this is where you'll find all my Victorian undergarments, sorted by era.  More will be added as I continue my exploration of Victorian fashion.  This page will not cover the "Romantic" era.  I know it's technically part of the Victorian Age, but due to the utter wackiness of the fashions, I think it deserves it own page.

 

 

Copyright this business. All rights reserved.

Web Hosting by Yahoo!